Chapter 11: |
The Infant |
|
Page 3
0f 11 |
|
|
Infant Scoring Systems
As soon as the delivery is complete, there are numerous
assessments to be made in order to determine the infant's health status.
These include checking the respiratory and cardiac status, and weight.
The Apgar scoring system (see Figure 1), named after Dr. Virginia Apgar,
was developed as an objective way to evaluate the general status of the
newborn at one minute and five minutes after birth. APGAR is also an acronym
for what the practitioner will assess: The practitioner evaluates newborn
Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiratory
rate and effort.
The five areas examined are respiratory effort, heart rate, muscle tone,
reflex irritability, and color (see Figure 1). Each area is given a score
of 0, 1, or 2 depending on the response noted. A score of "0" indicates
maximum distress/dysfunction for that parameter. A score of "2" means
the opposite. The first score is assessed at 1 minute after delivery,
with a second evaluation performed at 5 minutes. Since the Apgar is an
objective assessment of the infant's status, a 5-minute score that is
higher than the 1-minute score indicates the effectiveness of the resuscitation.
After assigning numerical scores for the categories, scores are totaled,
with normal infants scoring 7 to 10, moderately depressed infants scoring
4 to 6, and severely depressed infants scoring less than 4. Realistically,
in the clinical setting the latter infants are not scored immediately
because they are obviously in severe distress, and resuscitation measures
are instituted before there is time to total scores.
The Apgar evaluations can be done every 5 minutes as needed, up to 20
minutes or when the resuscitation ends. The 5-minute Apgar score is predictive
of future impairment, with a low score being associated with a likelihood
of long-term damage. For example, an Apgar score of two or less at one
minute is associated with a high mortality rate. An Apgar score of 8-10
is considered normal.
Figure 1. The Apgar scoring system.
Scoring Component |
How Component is Tested |
Score 0 |
Score 1 |
Score 2 |
|
Ausculation or count pulses at junction of umbilical cord & abdomen |
Absent |
Slow below 100 |
Over 100 |
|
Observation |
Apnea |
Slow, Irregular |
Good, yelling |
|
Observation: resistance to straightening of extremities |
Limp |
Somewhat flexible |
Well flexed |
|
Flick soles of feet/insert catheter in nostril |
No Response |
Grimace withdraws |
Vigorous cry |
|
Observation |
Blue or pale hands & feet blue |
Body pink; |
Completely pink |
As you can see, the Apgar is an excellent method for assessing the effectiveness
of resuscitation, however it should not be used as the sole basis for
making resuscitative decisions. One limitation of the Apgar system is
that it was designed to assess normal full term infants, not preemies,
so it is less valuable in their assessment. For evaluating premature neonates,
umbilical cord pH or the Silverman-Anderson scoring system may be more
valuable than Apgar.
In order to assess the degree of respiratory distress in neonates, practitioners
often use the Silverman-Anderson scoring system. Like the Apgar system
it evaluates five parameters and assigns a numerical score for each parameter.
However, unlike the Apgar score, the lower the total score the better
the baby in the Silverman-Anderson system. The best score possible in
each category is a "0" the worst is a "2". Parameters assessed are: retractions
of the upper chest, lower chest, and xiphoid, nasal flaring, and expiratory
grunt.
Table 3. Silverman-Anderson Scoring System
Score |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
synchronized |
lag on inspiration |
see-saw movement |
|
none |
just visible |
marked |
|
none |
just visible |
marked |
|
none |
minimal |
marked |
|
none |
stethoscope only |
naked eye and ear |
As you can see from Table 3, neonates with no retractions, flaring or
grunting with synchronized respiratory movements are scored with "0s".
Infants with visible retractions of the lower chest and xiphoid, with
the upper chest lagging compared to the lower on inspiration, receives
a "1". Minimal nasal flaring and an expiratory grunt heard only with a
stethoscope also receive a "1". Marked retractions with a "see-saw" movement
of the upper and lower chests deserves a "2". Marked nasal flaring and
audible expiratory grunting also deserve a "2". Normal babies have a cumulative
score close to "0". Severely depressed babies score close to "10".
-Next
Page-
|